Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evidence-based surgery is no passing fad -- Johnson et al., 10.1093 humrep dem423 -- Human Reproduction
The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Homeland of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions oxfordjournals.org Gynaecologic surgery from uncertainty to science: evidence-based surgery is no passing fad N.P. Johnson 1, 4, T.
Selman 2, J. Zamora 3 and K.S. Khan 2 1 Branch of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Governmental Women"s Health, Continuous 12, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, Just out Zealand 2 Department of Reproductive and Babe Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK 3 Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Infirmary Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain 4 Letter address. The location was to procession the available evidence replica in gynaecologic surgery, to assess what success has been fabricated and to drive gaps in the evidence for clinical decision-making.
The reviews were categorized as to if they had if evidence of effectiveness for pre-defined outcomes of most relevance to patients. Habitual themes of single methodological challenges and pitfalls with trials of surgical interventions were apparent.
CONCLUSIONS: Cochrane reviews get out a enduring means to establishing a sound evidence representation in gynaecologic surgery: some gaps in the evidence posses been eliminated and others highlighted.
In general, gynecology has been a speciality where surgical interventions hold been fit exposed to the scrutiny of RCTs compared with other surgical specialties.
Disclaimer: Please memo that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created completed digital scanning and may therefrom not licence replicate the passage of the embryonic print issues.
